The Greek Dilemma

Posted on May 16, 2012 by Henrik

article 2139455 12E99AAE000005DC 604 634x422 The Greek Dilemma

The markets are frenzied worldwide, we have seen steep sell offs in the European, North American as well as Asian markets across the board during the last weeks, all due to Greece, a country whose economy makes up a small percentage of the European economy and a tiny percentage of the world economy. The equity value the world markets have lost is tenfold that of the entire Greece economy. The Capital Research Institute has been calling for a Greek default for years, it would have been better in the beginning, so far the bailouts amount to more than the default would have cost in the first place. Almost none of the bailout money stays in Greece, it get’s transferred to the banks right away, so the bailouts are not for Greece, but once again for incompetent bankers that made risky bets by loaning too much money to a country that should have never been able to borrow the money in the first place. You can consider the loans to Greece subprime loans, driven by pure greed.

Now there is talk that Greece will leave the European Union, which also should have been considered years ago, the reason is that the inflation due to the transition to the Euro crippled the economy and that even austerity won’t fix the problem, which creates the dilemma. Just remember when Germany started the transition to the Euro, at first stores would publish two prices, one in Deutsche Mark and one in Euro, which was about 2 to 1, that was intended for the Germans to get used to the new currency. But what happened over the months was that prices started to creep up, businesses made the argument that the transition to the Euro would cost a substantial amount of resources in order to implement the change, like changing cashiers to the new currency, printing new price tags, training of staff, etc. Eventually, as many Germans will be able to confirm, the Euro price became the old Deutsch Mark price, for example a liter of milk might have cost 1 Deutsche Mark (DM), but once the Euro came that same liter of milk now costs 1 Euro, which translates to 100% inflation. Many price tags where simply switched from DM to Euro without changing the number.

When Greece switched to the Euro it was even more extreme, a country whose economy primarily lived of tourism due to its beautiful old architecture and history was affordable until the country got stuck with the Euro which dramatically increased prices. Many businesses looked over the border and saw that in Germany certain goods cost x Euros, and then they thought that if Germans paid that much in their own country they should pay the same in Greece when they are on vacation, over time many other businesses followed the same path not considering that the people of Greece also had to pay those inflated prices on a much smaller salary. The next step was to increase public sector salaries in order to keep up with the price increases due to the transition to the Euro, which started the problem that we see today.

Let’s assume that the Greek agree to the austerity and stick with the Euro, that means lower salaries and lower disposable income, therefore a reduction in the standard of living. Besides that there is no economic growth happening and the country will have an ongoing recession for many years to come. That’s why people protest against the austerity rules that the Germans, EU and IMF want to have implemented, which is understandable. The other option is for Greece to leave the EU and the Euro in order to use their own currency again, but what happens to the inflated prices? In order for that strategy to work, prices would have to drift lower again, causing price deflation, which in return will also cause GDP to drift lower and again Greece will have a recession. Therefore causing the dilemma, they are dammed if they do and they are dammed if they don’t.

So what can be done to solve this problem? As we have stated in many of our previous posts, recessions need to be embraced as they are part of the natural businesses cycle that has existed for thousands of years. Year over year growth is exponential growth, which is unsustainable in the long run, 2% growth this year is more than 2% growth last year since this year’s figure is based on 102% of the last year’s figure. Prices within Greece should be based on the disposable income of the people within that country, not based on the disposable income of the richest nations in the currency union that come for holidays. The same can be said about Italy and Spain, countries which used to be very affordable to go visit before the Euro was implemented, now they are just as expensive and sometimes more expensive than the northern European countries.

In the last few days Greek’s have been running the banks to get their savings out in fear that the Euro will continue to sink in value should Greece leave the Euro behind. So why should the banks be bailed out in the first place since all the money of the bailouts goes right into the greedy pockets of the bankers rather than help the Greek economy recover by rebuilding sustainable businesses? Why should the people of all Eurozone countries even consider participating in these bailouts of the banks, if the banks made bad loans than they need to write them down and take the hit, instead of punishing all Europeans including the Greek. Politicians have zero integrity, they are just a bunch of puppets paid off by the banking cartels, and they are just as corrupt and greedy as the bankers themselves.

The governments and politicians of the individual EU countries as well as the EU government should be ashamed of themselves; they should all be in prison for stealing money from the public in order to bailout the banks. Let all those greedy bankers fail, let all the banks fail that have made bad bets, even if that means the entire financials system will collapse, which is just proof that the whole system is a house of cards build on pure greed and narcissism. It is time to start over; implement a system of sound money that is sustainable and that supports the public, rather than rob it by creating money out of thin air and then charging compound interest to further rob the public of its hard earned money.

Not just the Greeks should be in the streets demonstrating, every single European should be in the streets telling the bankers and governments that this has to stop. It is time for a new era and to implement a new financial system based on sound money. The Euro has been an absolute failure and its implementation has been inherently flawed. These next years will mirror the Lost Decades in Japan with unlimited amounts of bailouts and further quantitative easing. The markets will love that news because the easy money party goes on, also just driven by pure greed of investors, but fundamentally it will do nothing for the people and it will only prolong a painful crash of the entire financial system years later.

It is time for change, change that all of us have to demand, bailouts are not a solution to the problem, it will just prolong the inevitable truth of a complete system failure.

Thank for your time, we know these are tough times and the Capital Research Institute wishes all of our visitors and subscribers the best.

Posted in Economy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Currency Wars – Survival of the Weakest

Posted on March 10, 2012 by Henrik

20101016 ldp001 Currency Wars – Survival of the Weakest

The Fed and the ECB are continuing to pump trillions of dollars into the financial system to keep aggregate demand and therefore GDP from collapsing. The excess liquidity puts downward pressure on currency exchange rates, Guido Mantega, the Brazilian Finance Minister stated in 2010 that developed countries have started to engage in “currency wars”, also known as competitive devaluation.

The first currency war started in the 1930s during the Great Depression when countries dropped the gold standard, which resulted in a loss of intrinsic value and therefore devaluation of the currencies as nothing backed the paper money in circulation. When one country devalues its currency it gains a short term advantage until the neighboring countries follow suit. Once competing countries have devalued there is no more advantage and the price to pay is that international trade suffers, which in the end impacts all countries negatively. The major players were the United States, the UK, and France, of which the former two dropped the Gold standard in 1933 and 1930 respectively.

The currency wars of the 1930s ended with the Tripartite Agreement in September 1936, countries agreed to sell gold to each other in the seller’s currencies at an agreed fixed price, which helped to stabilize exchange rates . During the years until 1971 under the Bretton Woods agreement, countries did not have the option to engage in currency wars; even after the gold standard was abolished countries had little incentive to engage in competitive devaluation since no synchronized effort among nations existed.

During the 1997 Asian Financial crisis, countries lacked sufficient foreign currency reserves and therefore had to accept tough economic terms from the IMF. After the crisis, Asian countries started to intervene in the currency markets to keep their currencies low in order to increase exports as well as to have sufficient reserves to defend speculative currency attacks and protect from further crisis.

The recent financial meltdown of 2008 caused the re-emergence of currency wars as countries look for ways to improve their financial positions by reducing large current account deficits. Developed countries chose export strategies through competitive devaluation. Central Banks have several options to participate in currency wars; they have the ability to intervene in the foreign exchange market by selling their own currencies. Another method which the Capital Research Institute (CRI) has covered in much detail is Quantitative Easing (QE), a practice of central banks to paper over a recession by increasing the money supply, which the Fed, ECB, and central banks of the UK, China, India and Japan engaged in. A QE strategy also includes a low interest rate strategy due to the increased money supply, which leaves room for arbitrage, also known as the carry trade, borrowing money in low interest nations to reinvest in high interest nations like Brazil.

Another method to impact a countries exchange rate is through the use of capital controls, which Brazil implemented in order to control capital in and out flows of the country. At the beginning of March 2012 Reuters reported that Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff, a career economist, slammed rich nations for “unleashing a tsunami of cheap money that was cannibalizing poorer countries such as her own, forcing them to act to protect struggling local industries”. She said that these capital inflows are due to low interest rate polices in developed nations and that her country is flooded with easy money by investors trying to secure higher yields. Her statement came hours after Brazil announced an extension of taxes on foreign loans, a form of capital control. Rousseff further stated that “We have a currency war that is based on an expansionary monetary policy that creates unequal conditions for competition” and concluded “we will continue to develop (our) country by defending its industry and ensuring that the strategy used by the developed countries to exit the crisis does not cannibalize emerging markets”.

The US has been accusing China of currency manipulation by keeping its currency artificially low, even though the US is the real winner of the currency war as the US dollar has lost value relative to most other currencies since the financial crisis began. The US is plagued with high unemployment; one way to increase employment is to increase exports, which are supported by a relatively low US dollar. China also needs to keep the Yuan-USD exchange rate low in order to keep exports stable, otherwise the country could face a significant downturn followed by high unemployment in the manufacturing sector, which would in turn affect the EU, especially the German economy that depends on growth in China to export its manufactured products such as cars and machinery. An interest rate hike in the US could cause a domino effect that could send the world economy into a renewed recession due to the above mentioned contagion.

While some countries engage in currency wars, others will pay the price due to decreasing exports. Recent news highlight the impact competitive devaluation has on major exporting nations as exports are slowing down. Reported in March 2012, Japan’s current account and trade deficit hit a record high in January, even though a weak Yen has been seen as “growth hormone” for the export driven economy, it is now backfiring due to Japan’s reliance on importing fuel for energy production since the Fukushima accident a year ago . Even Australia, which has been doing very well due to continued exports of coal and iron to China, recorded its first trade deficit in eleven month in January and an 8% drop in exports, the largest drop in the past three years. The Australian dollar had appreciated 4% against the US dollar this year so far . Also Brazil reported a current account deficit of $7.1 billion in January 2012, the largest deficit on record and the real has appreciated 9.3% against the US dollar this year, more than any other currency .

China recorded the largest trade deficit during February since 1989, a shortfall of $31.5 billion. The deficit along with lower retail sales, industrial output and inflation estimates may lead the Chinese government to ease policies by reducing the rate of reserves banks have to hold, which would increase available funding to stimulate economic growth . Exporting nations like China, Brazil, Australia, and Japan have historically enjoyed current account and trade surpluses, this shift in economic trade could further increase participation in currency wars in order to increase the competitiveness of each country’s exports. There is more to China’s deficit as we look closer; while exports to the EU collapsed, China’s imports increased 39.6% from last year.

Even though the year to year figures have not dramatically changed, since June 2011 China has been selling US Treasuries from a high of $1.315 trillion in July 2011 to $1.152 trillion by the end of December 2011, a reduction of $163 billion. In past years, China did not have much of a choice than to continue to reinvest large trade surpluses into US Treasuries in order to keep inflation under control, but that trend seems to be changing, the question is which alternative China is taking to invest these surpluses.

Chin Holding of US Treasuries 32387 image001 Currency Wars – Survival of the Weakest

Instead of continuing to purchase US Treasuries in order to invest large trade surpluses, China has increased imports of crude oil to record levels in January 2012. The trade surpluses must be reinvested in order to keep the excess liquidity out of the Chinese financial system, otherwise inflation would be very difficult to control. Since it is questionable if China will ever see a single cent of their investments in US Treasuries, it is not surprising that China is looking for alternative ways to invest. With its huge appetite for crude oil, it makes for a good strategic alternative compared to further purchases of US treasuries. Bloomberg reported this month that “China, the world’s second-largest crude consumer, finished filling the first phase of its emergency stockpile with 103.2 million barrels of oil in 2009. The second phase, comprising eight locations with a storage capacity of 168.6 million barrels, is scheduled to be completed by early 2013. The Lanzhou depot has a capacity of 18.9 million barrels”. The following graph shows China’s increase in crude imports during the last 10 years.

2 3 2012 7 37 58 AM China Total Crude Imports2 Currency Wars – Survival of the Weakest

Now that we know what currency wars mean for developed and emerging nations, let’s consider the impact currency wars have on individuals. Since individuals purchase goods in the local currency the price impact of local exported goods is insignificant, since the price for those items at home does not change. The real impact is the loss of purchasing power for imported goods, since those now become more expensive due to the devalued currency that is used to import them. The two imported items that individuals spend most of their disposable income on besides housing are gasoline and food; both become more expensive due to competitive devaluation. Currency wars cause the standard of living of individuals to decrease as prices of imported goods increase.

nb101211 2 Currency Wars – Survival of the Weakest

The excess liquidity from loose monetary policies leads to commodity price inflation and a loss in purchasing power of all major currencies since the end of the gold standard in 1971. Currency wars and competitive devaluation are the reasons why the Capital Research Institute recommends diversifying your wealth by buying gold and silver. We consider physical gold to be one of the best currencies as it holds its intrinsic value while fiat currencies decrease. Gold represents a thousand year old store of value, since 1971 currencies have lost purchasing power year over year as central banks continue to print money. It is a race to the bottom and individuals that hold fiat currencies will ultimately pay the price.

Thank you for your time and for regularly checking back at the Capital Research Institute (CRI) as we unravel the web of international finance.

Posted in Economy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Time to Break Up the Media Monopoly

Posted on February 24, 2012 by Louis

NO MONOPOLY Time to Break Up the Media Monopoly

As everyone knows by now, the US election cycle is in full swing.  Concerned about the economy?  The welfare of the nation?  What kind of country your grandkids will grow up in?  If you listen to the mainstream media (msm) then you ‘know’ the answer is to choose a political party, stick with them, and everything will work out fine…  The problem is, this couldn’t be further from the truth.  The political parties no longer serve the people, they only pay lip service to them (read: make campaign promises that are quickly forgotten post-election).  The real orders come from the big money players: corporations, the lobbyists they employ, and the ”High Net Worth” individuals that control them.  Of course, maintaining the illusion that the Republicans and Democrats are battling it out daily for the good of the nation is crucial.   All the debates, the wrangling, the mudslinging, the political deadlocks, are for show.

There’s no honesty in politics, that much is clear.  But why does the media do such a poor job of keeping politicians honest?  If the people of a nation understand the issues that they are facing, and what is required to resolve them, they will take collective action.  But if the media is able to successfully ‘divide and conquer’ the population (as they have the last few decades) the ability for people to come together in the name of real change is greatly diminished.

Take the national debt, the annual deficit, the War on Terror, the Federal Reserve and the private banking cartel, or the bank bailouts as examples.  These are issues where the population should be able to agree not only on what the underlying problem is, but also how to solve it.  You don’t need me to tell you these issues have not only NOT been resolved, they are bigger problems now than ever before.

What people in general seem to have failed to realize is that there is no such thing as the Free Press any more.  Radio is dominated by only 6 companies. Print media has the same problem.  All the television channels on TV (with almost no exceptions) are owned by one of six companies, GE, Walt Disney, News Corp,  Time Warner, Viacom or CBS.   With a return of the free press public outrage would be MUCH greater than it is currently, and not only would people cry “Something must be done!” they might even think for themselves what it is that must be done.

Here at the CRI it seems clear to us that in order to have a well-educated, politically active population, the first hurdle is to break up the current media monopoly.  Changing how public opinion is generated is crucial, but so is the ability to keep politicians honest.  The public would once again have a voice in political decisions.  From there, the next step  would be to break up the banking cartel, a crucial aspect of reducing the wealth inequality that continues to cripple the world economy.

(“In 2007 the richest 1% of the American population owned 34.6% of the country’s total wealth“)

So what can you do?  First of all, people need to take everything they hear on TV with a massive grain of salt.  Second, don’t buy ANYTHING that is advertised on TV.  That is your most effective weapon against the corporate-owned media.  Lastly, use a wide range of Internet sources for your information.

Check in again with the Capital Research Institute as we celebrate our first anniversary, and in the weeks to come provide our ‘Year in Review’.  Until next time!

Posted in General, media | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Deleveraging – A Balance Sheet Recession

Posted on January 2, 2012 by Henrik

deleveraging Deleveraging A Balance Sheet Recession

After a short break we are back at work at the Capital Research Institute (CRI). The world economy is continuing to try to shake off the 2008 financial crisis, Europe is still in big trouble with no end in sight and the US is quietly trying to maintain stability and solvency. Since no real improvements have been made during the last years we cannot expect things to get better for the long term, short-sightedness is what modern politics is driven by since nobody can guarantee to be re-elected, thus making plans for more than 4-5 years is unrealistic since everything could change after the next election. During the last few month we have stated our beliefs that the US as well as Europe are on the same track as Japan was during the “Lost Decades” through which zero interest rates policies (ZIRP) were maintained for many years to provide funding to insolvent zombie banks and corporations.

The Lost Decades resemble what we call balance sheet recessions due to deleveraging of the financial system. Europe and the US will go through the same deleveraging process during the next five to ten years. Corporations, banks, and households have borrowed too much money in order to invest in various derivatives and real estate. For example, when AIG started to have trouble in 2008 the hedge fund responsible for those massive derivative bets only made up about 3% of AIG’s balance sheet, yet due to the excessive leverage of the fund it almost took down the whole company. A leverage of 33 to 1 means that a 3% change in the value of the investment would wipeout close to 100% of the equity. A leverage of 30:1 is more common than one might think, which is like a kid playing with fire. Since banks and institutions are not willing to lend at the moment as nobody knows what toxic assets the others are holding, companies are forced to pay off their existing debt due to lack of available funding.

With companies paying off debt and therefore decreasing their leverage reduces growth opportunities, which leads to a balance sheet recession. The Lost Decades were caused by balance sheet recessions for the same reason. Deleveraging happens during times when asset bubbles burst such as the US housing bubble and the underlying assets become worth less than the equity left in the investments, at which time investors sell the assets and pay off the debt. Deleveraging is also the reason why the by so many expected massive inflation due to QE has not realized, since the extra liquidity in the system is offset by the reduction in leverage by corporations and individuals.

What is counter-intuitive to most economists is that companies should not pay down debt with ZIRP, meaning there is no better use for the money even at zero interest than to pay off debt which costs the companies almost nothing to begin with. The reason why companies would pay off debt with ZIRP is that the balance sheets are under water due to excessive leverage during the bubble period. At the micro level it makes sense for companies to pay off debt to balance their finances again, but at the macro level when everybody decides to pay off their debt during ZIRP means massive deleveraging since these companies would otherwise be bankrupt even at zero interest.

As many of our newsletter subscribers know, 95% of money is created by private banks, but when households and companies decide to pay off debt, the money multiplier effect is cut short since private banks cannot lend out deposits at a multiplier. Without available funding for further investments, asset prices will fall such as we have seen in housing prices. If we take a look at what happened to real net worth per capita we can see that in the US the blowing up of the housing bubble has caused a dramatic drop in per capita net worth. It is interesting to note that prices leveled off at a level before the housing bubble started in 2000, when Greenspan tried to paper over the blowing up of the dot com bubble. This is similar to what happened in Japan during the Lost Decades.

6a00d83451b33869e2014e894bdc0d970d 800wi Deleveraging A Balance Sheet Recession

Based on the understanding of deleveraging and balance sheet recessions, austerity will not work unless the private sector is maximizing the use of cash and has healthy balance sheets, which we know is not the case in Europe and the US. Planned austerity measures will only fuel the recession. If we look at real per capita liabilities in the US, we can see that they have steadily decreased since the financial crisis, illustrating the point that the private sector is deleveraging by paying off debt. Without investments and better use of cash by the private sector, unemployment will stay high since companies are not growing and hiring. Even though we don’t belief in excessive stimulus and taking on more debt, in this case more stimulus is needed in order to maintain stability in aggregate demand, if that is the wanted outcome to keep GDP from collapsing. Others may argue let aggregate demand and therefore GDP collapse for a massive recession and possibly depression in order to fix the broken financial system to eventually implement a newer more stable system. Both sides of the argument can be taken and each comes with its pros and cons.

So what should be done? That is a difficult question and will take some creative thinking in regards to economic theory hybridization. As we have previously mentioned we belief that new economic theories are needed, short term stimulus is acceptable in order to keep aggregate demand stable to keep the economy from collapsing during a period when a massive asset bubble bursts, on the other hand stimulus needs to be controlled and normal recessions should be embraced. Austrians and Keynesians need to sit down together and draft new hybrid theories in order to have well thought through economic theories. Yet a balance sheet recession is different in that it is caused by deleveraging of the financial system. As the graph shows, US real per capita liabilities have significantly decreased since the recession due to the private sector deleveraging.

6a00d83451b33869e20154332bd5dc970c 800wi Deleveraging A Balance Sheet Recession

We belief that the FED and ECB will implement further stimulus. The central banks have little choice but to pump more money into the financial system to keep GDP from collapsing, even though the economy will further get worse and worse unless the private sector finds better use of money than to pay down debt. There is a lot to be learned from Japan and its experience during the Lost Decades. The concept of balance sheet recessions is fairly new; at the time the Maastricht Treaty was signed the concept was not yet known outside of Japan. As we know consumption is what drives the US economy, but since the private sector chooses to save and pay off debt, consumption is curtailed and therefore leads to another recession and continuing high unemployment. The European sovereign debt crisis is far from over and with politicians willing to do anything to keep the Euro alive, we can expect can interesting financial year.

We wish all of our subscribers and visitors a Happy New Year! The year 2012 should prove to be an exciting year. Please check back with us regularly since we are back at work.

Posted in Economy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

On Behalf of the 99%

Posted on October 24, 2011 by Louis

“Rise up, be counted.
Stand strong, and Unite.”
- “Outcry“, Dream Theater

The level of financial education of the average citizen (of any nation) ranges from poor to nonexistent.  Normally this would not be a big deal.  After all, only a  rudimentary knowledge of finance and economics is required in day-to-day life.   Get paid, buy clothes and groceries, hold some in the bank for future purposes.  Plus, you can count on the media to keep you abreast of the major developments and issues.  But we are in an age of turmoil, that will see the demise of USD as world reserve currency, while former members of the (so-called) middle class will see their pensions and purchasing power steadily eroded.  And the media for the most part is completely in the dark, at best, or complicit, at worst.

The point being, people don’t really know WHAT they want, in terms of reform.  Thats why the ‘Change’ gimmick worked so well for Obama.  Because people KNOW they want change, they just want someone to tell them what will be changed, and why that will be better.  Herman Cain’s 9-9-9 plan is the exact same.  People aren’t worried about the specifics, they just know they want change.   Well, I am here to help steer the herd a little, as it were.

What is needed is the banning of usury, an end to the Federal Reserve System, and a return to Sound Money, for starters.  Usury is known to the average person in the form of: credit card debt, payday loans, and any type of loan from a loan shark.  It is characterized by high rates of compound interest.  This makes it increasingly difficult to pay off.  It was illegal in the Middle Ages.  Money could still be borrowed, but interest would be lower, and it would be simple interest, not compounding.  The Federal Reserve System is a private banking cartel that currently has the power to create US Dollars out of thin air, with nothing more than a few keystrokes.  There are many excellent sources of information regarding the ongoing deception by The Fed.  A personal favorite is “Secrets of the Federal Reserve”, Eustace Mullins.

A return to Sound Money ends the nonstop devaluation of currency by bankers and politicians, meaning people’s savings will retain purchasing power, a powerful incentive to save and invest.     Once the above has been accomplished the issue of dealing with record levels of wealth disparity would need to be addressed.  A key problem in society is that the gains accrue to a very small percentage of the population, hence the collective conscious has responded, and given birth to what we are currently witnessing: “We are the 99%”

It would be worth remembering an old country song about debt bondage and the use of scrip at this point, called “16 Tons”:

“You load 16 tons and whaddaya get??
Another day older and deeper in debt
Saint Peter don’tcha call me ‘Cause-
I can’t go…I owe my soul to the Company Store”

Speaking on behalf of the 99%, we are tired of Debt Slavery and the current incarnation of NeoFeudalism!   Ban Usury, End the Fed, Return Sound Money.  All day, all week!

Sign up for our free newsletter, and remember to check back with the Capital Research Institute, as we continue to unravel The Web of International Finance.

Posted in Economy, General | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Jubilee, An Idea Whose Time Has Come

Posted on October 11, 2011 by Louis

arch Jubilee, An Idea Whose Time Has Come

Forbes recently featured an article that I did not read until today.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/2011/10/05/could-national-debt-forgiveness-help-kickstart-the-american-economy/

Could debt forgiveness kickstart America’s economy?  The answer is yes.  It is something the Capital Research Institute has previously suggested.  As suggested in the article, on its own it is not enough.  But it is a crucial step in the right direction.

Now, many people are weary of debt-forgiveness because it reminds them of the government bailouts, that it is stealing from those who lent their hard-earned savings to others.  Superficially, it is a legitimate comparison, but it does not hold up.  For one, while the bailouts helped a small group, financial institutions that by and large serve as a proxy for the richest segment of society, a jubilee would be universal.  Secondly, while the bailouts created moral hazard (the expectation that TBTF were bailed out once, so management doesn’t care if they go bankrupt again, they will be bailed out no matter what) Jubilee would be established under absolute terms, it will only happen once every 50 or 70 years.

Of course, if all debts are forgiven, the businesses (i.e. banks) that rely on the repayment of those debts will be not be nearly as powerful or profitable.  If you lent more than you yourself borrowed ((i.e. you own bonds in excess of your student loans, mortgage debt, credit card debt and portion of the national debt), then you will not be a beneficiary.  You also won’t be that bad off, though, because you will start from scratch, owing no one, like everyone else.   So the richest would stand to lose the most, and those who borrowed beyond their means would gain the most.  Unintended consequences will always exist, but by limiting the re-occurence of Jubilees the system would hopefully be fraud-resistant.  The largest property owners would benefit, and it would probably be necessary to enact land reforms of some sort.  Pensions would likely need to be looked at as a separate issue. But the overarching readjustment in wealth disparity between the richest 1% and the rest of us would be the ‘piece de resistance’.  Income for most would go up, due to less money being spent paying interest on debt.

Now what else would have to be instituted alongside a Jubilee?  Well, sound money, i.e. backed by gold and/or silver, is top of that list.  It would ensure that we don’t just enter another cycle of fiat debasement, government deficit spending, food and energy inflation run amok.  Banning usury would be up there.  Usury as defined by the CRI is high rates of compound interest.  Charging a low rate of simple interest would not be considered usury, for e.g.  This would help ensure that debt slavery is not just abolished  temporarily.

That is just what is needed from the financial perspective.  From an economics perspective, the ‘Developed World’  needs to start manufacturing again, plain and simple.  A voluntary 4 day work week would provide demand for new workers.  The point is not to have government legislate solutions, though.  The point is that society has the tools to solve its problems, if it ‘wants it bad enough’.

The greatest benefit heretofore unmentioned would be the destruction of Elite’s money creation mechanism, whereby they can create money out of thin air, and lend it to the rest of the population with interest (or to their bankster buddies, without interest, as the case may be).   From this digital gold mine does flow the power to control markets… And nations!

Surely the Jubilee is an idea whose time has come!  Thanks for checking in with the Capital Research Institute, don’t forget to sign up for our monthly newsletter, and visit us again as we continue to Unravel The Web of International Finance!

Posted in Economy, General, Gold Standard | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment